trailThe Randall-Sundrum II braneworld is holographically dual to four-dimensional gravity coupled to a strongly coupled conformal field theory with a cutoff
Brane-localized black holes in warped compactifications evaporate rather than remaining stable
Static black holes localized on the brane exist at all sizes in the Randall-Sundrum II model
Derivation from cutoff AdS/CFT· for
The AdS/CFT correspondence relates gravitational theories in anti-de Sitter space to conformal field theories on the boundary
atomic
Truncating anti-de Sitter space at a finite radius corresponds to an ultraviolet cutoff in the dual conformal field theory
atomic
In the Randall-Sundrum single-brane model, four-dimensional Newtonian gravity is recovered at distances large compared to the AdS curvature radius
atomic
Newton's-law correction check· for
The leading correction to Newton's law in the Randall-Sundrum II model matches the one-loop graviton correction from the dual conformal field theory
atomic
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
The Randall-Sundrum II braneworld is holographically dual to four-dimensional gravity coupled to a strongly coupled conformal field theory with a cutoff
unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →
2depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisesupportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.