Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailRadiation from a micro black hole accreting inside dense stellar matter is trapped and advected inward with the accretion flow
Accretion by micro black holes inside dense stars is limited by the Eddington luminosity.
Micro black holes captured inside neutron stars or white dwarfs accrete at approximately the Bondi rate
Photon trapping condition· for
For micro black holes accreting in white-dwarf or neutron-star matter, the photon trapping radius far exceeds the Bondi radius
atomic
Simulation evidence· for
Black holes inside neutron stars accrete at the Bondi rate without radiative feedback halting the accretion
atomic
assumed
Accretion flow onto a black hole embedded inside a star is quasi-spherical rather than disk-like
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
Radiation from a micro black hole accreting inside dense stellar matter is trapped and advected inward with the accretion flow
No current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution
contradictssupportsrequiressupportsassumes
2depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisethis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.