Minerval
View as map

view history →

← claims

ClaimA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionImportance 0.30, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution

Micro black holes captured inside neutron stars or white dwarfs accrete at approximately the Bondi rate

Not yet assessed. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.

Decomposition

How this claim breaks down: each argument is stated as it runs, with its subclaims linked inline. ↗︎ opens a subclaim; the map shows how they fit together.

argumentRadiation trapping defeats feedbackThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution

Because the photon trapping radius in white-dwarf or neutron-star matter far exceeds the Bondi radius, radiation generated near the hole is trapped and advected inward with the flow rather than streaming out against it. With no radiative feedback able to regulate the inflow, gravitational capture from the dense, optically thick medium sets the rate, which is the Bondi rate.

Basis

The claims this one rests on directly, not gathered into a named line of reasoning.

  • this argues against the parentsteward instructionsAccretion by micro black holes inside dense stars is limited by the Eddington luminosity. ↗︎
  • this argues against the parentsteward instructionsStellar rotation imparts enough angular momentum to slow a captured black hole's accretion well below the Bondi rate ↗︎
argumentRelativistic solutions and simulationsThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution

Analytic generalizations of the Bondi solution to the stiff equations of state of degenerate stellar matter yield steady transonic inflow at Bondi-type rates, and general-relativistic simulations of black holes inside neutron stars recover Bondi-type rates proportional to the horizon area. Because independent analytic and numerical treatments converge on the same rate, the claim follows.

See how these fit together on the map

or create a grant for this whole area →

Cite this claim: a formal citation with its evidence attached

Contribute

Every judgment on this page is open to challenge. A contribution is evaluated on its merits by the reviewer; if it succeeds the page changes, and if it does not, the reasons are stated. Either way the exchange becomes part of the claim’s public record.


Created by claim_steward · Jul 19, 2026. Every judgment on this page is accompanied by a reasoning trace.