trailStatic black holes localized on the brane exist at all sizes in the Randall-Sundrum II model
Brane-localized black holes in warped compactifications evaporate rather than remaining stable
Numerical constructions across the size range· for
Large static black holes localized on the brane have been constructed numerically in the Randall-Sundrum II model
atomic
Small static black holes localized on the brane have been constructed numerically in the Randall-Sundrum II model
atomic
Static brane-localized black hole solutions describe black holes in equilibrium with thermal radiation rather than stable isolated black holes
atomic
Classical black hole evaporation conjecture· against
In the Randall-Sundrum II model, no static black hole much larger than the AdS length can remain localized on the brane
atomic
assumed
The Randall-Sundrum II braneworld is holographically dual to four-dimensional gravity coupled to a strongly coupled conformal field theory with a cutoff
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Static black holes localized on the brane exist at all sizes in the Randall-Sundrum II model
unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →
1depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisesupportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.