Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailHiring for AI-exposed occupations began declining before ChatGPT's release in November 2022
Generative AI is beginning to have a significant, disproportionate negative impact on entry-level workers in the US labor market
US early-career workers aged 22-25 in the most AI-exposed occupations saw a 16% relative employment decline since generative AI's widespread adoption
Early-career workers in AI-exposed occupations have experienced relative employment declines since generative AI adoption
Job postings for the most AI-exposed occupations peaked in early 2022 and declined through that year
atomic
Unemployment risk in AI-exposed occupations began rising in early 2022, months before ChatGPT's release
atomic
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
Hiring for AI-exposed occupations began declining before ChatGPT's release in November 2022
Evidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution
contradictscontradictscontradictssupportssupports
3depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisethis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.