Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailThe top-quark pole mass has an intrinsic renormalon ambiguity of roughly 110 to 250 MeV
The parton-shower infrared cutoff makes the generator top-quark mass a short-distance mass differing from the pole mass by roughly half a GeV
The Monte Carlo top-quark mass equals the pole mass to within a few hundred MeV
Angular-ordered parton showers with an infrared cutoff produce a generator quark mass that is a cutoff-dependent short-distance mass, not the pole mass
+2
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
The top-quark pole mass has an intrinsic renormalon ambiguity of roughly 110 to 250 MeV
No current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution
assumesassumessupports
5depended on by
This claim has not been assessed yet. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; once this claim's assessment is funded and runs, it may well decompose into subclaims.
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisethis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.