Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailEvaluators paid by the party they evaluate face incentives to reach favorable conclusions
Safety case reviewers are commonly commissioned by the developer, creating incentives toward confirmatory sign-off
Industry-sponsored studies report conclusions favorable to the sponsor more often than independently funded studies
atomic
The issuer-pays model caused credit rating agencies to assign inflated ratings before the 2008 financial crisis
atomic
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
Evaluators paid by the party they evaluate face incentives to reach favorable conclusions
The claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionCredence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution
requiressupportssupports
1depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisethis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.