trailSteinhauer's Technion experiments observed correlated phonon pairs across a sonic horizon in a Bose-Einstein condensate.
The 2016 Technion measurement statistically established entanglement of the observed Hawking phonon pairs.
Spontaneous analogue Hawking radiation has been detected at sonic horizons in Bose-Einstein condensates.
The reported BEC analogue Hawking signal can be explained by amplified classical noise rather than quantum vacuum emission.
+1
A sonic horizon separating subsonic and supersonic flow can be created in a flowing Bose-Einstein condensate.
atomic
The cross-horizon density correlation signature was reproduced in successive Technion BEC experiments with improved statistics.
atomic
Simulations of BEC sonic horizons with thermal phonon populations reproduce the cross-horizon density correlation pattern.
atomic
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Steinhauer's Technion experiments observed correlated phonon pairs across a sonic horizon in a Bose-Einstein condensate.
✓VerifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →credence 0.95Credence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution →
4depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisesupportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.