trailLeonhardt's statistical critique of the 2016 Technion entanglement analysis rests on technical errors.
The 2016 Technion measurement statistically established entanglement of the observed Hawking phonon pairs.
The uncertainties in the 2016 Technion entanglement analysis were underestimated.
Steinhauer's rebuttal· for
Leonhardt's reanalysis assigned uncertainties to wavenumbers that were discrete and precisely determined in the 2016 Technion experiment.
atomic
The central charge survives the rebuttal· against
The scatter of the 2016 Technion correlation data is a valid estimator of its statistical uncertainty.
The true correlation function in the 2016 Technion experiment varies smoothly with wavenumber at the measured point spacing.
The 2016 Technion analysis statistically correlates neighboring wavenumber points of the correlation data.
The scatter of the 2016 Technion correlation data exceeds its published error bars.
atomic
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Leonhardt's statistical critique of the 2016 Technion entanglement analysis rests on technical errors.
unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →
2depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisesupportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.