Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailThe compute cost of the most expensive AI training run will reach about $230 billion (one percent of 2021 US GDP) around 2040.
Trend extrapolation· for
The most expensive AI training run in 2025 cost on the order of several hundred million dollars
atomic
Since September 2015, training costs for the largest-compute ML systems grew about 0.2 orders of magnitude per year, slower than the overall long-term trend.
atomic
The cost of frontier AI training runs continued to grow at more than 2x per year through the mid-2020s
atomic
+1 more
Limits to sustained cost growth· against
Growth of AI training spending at recent multi-fold annual rates is financially unsustainable through 2030
shared · shown elsewhere
Growth in spending on the largest AI training runs will slow substantially during the 2020s.
shared · shown elsewhere
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
The compute cost of the most expensive AI training run will reach about $230 billion (one percent of 2021 US GDP) around 2040.
Credible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionCredence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution
requiressupportssupportscontradictscontradicts
Nothing in the graph builds on this claim yet.
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisethis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.