Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailMETR's measured AI slowdown is robust across alternative statistical estimators and empirical strategies
Using AI tools caused experienced open-source developers to complete tasks about 20% slower in early 2025.
METR's 2025 AI slowdown finding generalizes to experienced open-source developers beyond its 16 participants.
METR's 2025 sample of 246 completed issues from 16 developers gave sufficient statistical power to detect AI's effect on developer productivity.
METR's measured AI slowdown remained statistically significant when accounting for developer-level clustering.
atomic
METR's measured AI slowdown estimate was similar across alternative outcome estimators, including a naive ratio estimator
atomic
Differential issue dropout and attrition do not explain METR's measured AI slowdown
atomic
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
METR's measured AI slowdown is robust across alternative statistical estimators and empirical strategies
Evidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution
supportssupportssupportssupportssupportssupports
3depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisethis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.